Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Climate / Environmental Health

Climate change is already affecting the health and well-being of Californians. Climate change threatens and harms human health through changes in environmental exposures, including more extreme heat and other severe weather events, worsened air quality, more frequent wildfires and smoke, increases in allergens, altered environmental conditions that foster the spread of infectious diseases, and other direct and indirect pathways. The resulting human health impacts include, but are not limited to, increased number of cases of heat-related illness and death, more air pollution-related cardiovascular and respiratory disease events, increased injury and loss of life due to wildfires, severe storms, and flooding, increased occurrences of water-borne and vector-borne diseases (such as Lyme Disease or Zika virus), and stress and mental trauma from loss of livelihoods, property loss, and displacement. 
 
While all Californians are affected by climate change, populations facing racial and health inequities, or systemic differences in racial and health status that are preventable and unfair, are impacted disproportionately. Certain population groups also have greater susceptibility to the health effects of climate change because of their proximity and sensitivity to climate-related environmental exposures and hazards. 

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Air Pollution due to Particulate Matter County: Humboldt

Current Value:

Air Pollution due to Particulate Matter County: Humboldt

6.8
Micrograms per cubic meter
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Humboldt has a value of 6.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.5.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Humboldt has a value of 6.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,115 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (7.1), Humboldt has a value of 6.8 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(7.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (7.4), Humboldt has a value of 6.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Humboldt (6.8) is less and better than the previously measured value (7.8).
Prior Value
(7.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Humboldt value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Annual Ozone Air Quality

Value
Compared to:

Annual Ozone Air Quality

Value
Compared to:

Annual Ozone Air Quality County: Humboldt

Current Value:

Annual Ozone Air Quality County: Humboldt

1
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to Air Quality Index, Humboldt has a value of 1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.
Air Quality Index
The American Lung Association (ALA) assigns grades A-F to counties (A=1; B=2; C=3; D=4; F=5), based on average annual number of days that ozone levels exceeded U.S. standards during the three year measurement period. The five-point grading scale was used for the distribution (Green = <2; Yellow = 2 - 3; Red = >3). The air quality data is collected by the EPA and summarized by the ALA.
Compared to the prior value, Humboldt (1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1).
Prior Value
(1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Humboldt value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Annual Particle Pollution

Value
Compared to:

Annual Particle Pollution

Value
Compared to:

Annual Particle Pollution County: Humboldt

Current Value:

Annual Particle Pollution County: Humboldt

2
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to Air Quality Index, Humboldt has a value of 2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.
Air Quality Index
The American Lung Association (ALA) assigns grades A-F to counties (A=1; B=2; C=3; D=4; F=5), based on average annual number of days that particle pollution levels exceeded U.S. standards during the three year measurement period. The five-point grading scale was used for the distribution (Green = <2; Yellow = 2 - 3; Red = >3). The air quality data is collected by the EPA and summarized by the ALA.
Compared to the prior value, Humboldt (2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2).
Prior Value
(2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Humboldt value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Recognized Carcinogens Released into Air County: Humboldt

Current Value:

Recognized Carcinogens Released into Air County: Humboldt

33,133
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Humboldt (33,133) is less and better than the previously measured value (40,239).
Prior Value
(40,239)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Humboldt value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

PBT Released

Value
Compared to:

PBT Released

Value
Compared to:

PBT Released County: Humboldt

Current Value:

PBT Released County: Humboldt

1
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Humboldt (1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1).
Prior Value
(1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Humboldt value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Number of Extreme Heat Days

Value
Compared to:

Number of Extreme Heat Days

Value
Compared to:

Number of Extreme Heat Days County: Humboldt

Current Value:

Number of Extreme Heat Days County: Humboldt

7
Days
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Humboldt (7) is less and better than the previously measured value (18).
Prior Value
(18)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Humboldt value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Number of Extreme Precipitation Days County: Humboldt

Current Value:

Number of Extreme Precipitation Days County: Humboldt

8
Days
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Humboldt (8) is less and better than the previously measured value (13).
Prior Value
(13)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Humboldt value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Number of Extreme Heat Events

Value
Compared to:

Number of Extreme Heat Events

Value
Compared to:

Number of Extreme Heat Events County: Humboldt

Current Value:

Number of Extreme Heat Events County: Humboldt

12
Events
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Humboldt (12) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6).
Prior Value
(6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Humboldt value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Proximity to Highways

Value
Compared to:

Proximity to Highways

Value
Compared to:

Proximity to Highways County: Humboldt

Current Value:

Proximity to Highways County: Humboldt

6.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Humboldt has a value of 6.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Humboldt has a value of 6.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (5.8%), Humboldt has a value of 6.3% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Humboldt (6.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.2%).
Prior Value
(6.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse County: Humboldt

Current Value:

Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse County: Humboldt

37
Weeks per year
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Humboldt (37) is less and better than the previously measured value (40).
Prior Value
(40)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Humboldt value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Asthma

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Asthma

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Asthma County: Humboldt

Current Value:

Adults with Asthma County: Humboldt

26.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Humboldt has a value of 26.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (17.0%), Humboldt has a value of 26.3% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (15.7%), Humboldt has a value of 26.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Humboldt (26.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.8%).
Prior Value
(24.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Humboldt value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Current Asthma

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Current Asthma

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Current Asthma County: Humboldt

Current Value:

Adults with Current Asthma County: Humboldt

11.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Humboldt has a value of 11.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Humboldt has a value of 11.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (9.9%), Humboldt has a value of 11.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(9.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Children and Teens with Asthma

Value
Compared to:

Children and Teens with Asthma

Value
Compared to:

Children and Teens with Asthma County: Humboldt

Current Value:

Children and Teens with Asthma County: Humboldt

11.8%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (11.6%), Humboldt has a value of 11.8% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(11.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Humboldt (11.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (15.7%).
Prior Value
(15.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Humboldt value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Asthma: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Asthma: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Asthma: Medicare Population County: Humboldt

Current Value:

Asthma: Medicare Population County: Humboldt

6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Humboldt has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Humboldt has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (7.0%), Humboldt has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Humboldt has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Humboldt (6.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Humboldt value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.